Monday, August 5, 2013
Tuesday, July 30, 2013
Thursday, June 27, 2013
Wednesday, June 26, 2013
Tuesday, June 25, 2013
Thursday, June 20, 2013
Sunday, June 9, 2013
Saturday, June 8, 2013
Thursday, May 30, 2013
Wednesday, May 29, 2013
Sunday, May 26, 2013
Saturday, May 25, 2013
Wednesday, May 22, 2013
Tuesday, May 21, 2013
Thursday, May 16, 2013
Wednesday, May 15, 2013
Monday, May 13, 2013
Saturday, May 11, 2013
Thursday, May 9, 2013
Wednesday, May 8, 2013
Erika James via Rochelle Rubinstein
![]() |
| Detail of "Cowboys Are Dangerous" - Erika James, 2013 Photograph © Shane Tyler Adams, all rights reserved. |
Looking for relationships between and combinations of visual elements comes with its own set of risks. One can drill down to the extent that in the reduction they miss the larger relationship or the larger context. As we seek the essential, we must remember to pull our heads out of our asses, step back and take a look around to make sure that there isn't something subtle - or blatant - on the periphery, the significance of which we may have missed. Case in point:
I often shoot through screens and frames looking for reflections and
interesting juxtapositions. At the time I walked by what you see part of above, I was only conscious of the
colours and text, the reflection of an urban environment, and, after a while, the
effect of the cold temperature on my motivation to experiment. Believe me, I
waited a long time for someone wearing a cowboy hat to walk by.
This is a detail of a piece by Erika James - shot through a window (duh). For part of the year I live in the middle of nowhere, surrounded by real cowboys (and cowgirls), open spaces, and animals. Perhaps because of that, I was relating directly to what I found in front of me, the colour, the text, and the possible irony (among many) presented by the reflections of an urban environment in the gallery window. What I didn't realize consciously at the time was that I was shooting another artist's work. This may or may not have caused me pause at the time - for a comparison, or context, Look at Jay Maisel's shot of Tom Otterness's giant bronze mouse looking over the schoolboy's shoulder.
If you are in Toronto, go see the Mon Ton Gallery - 402 College Street. I mean it. Rochelle Rubinstein curates the exhibits there. Keep your eyes out for Erika James' work.
Tuesday, April 2, 2013
Friday, December 14, 2012
Wednesday, December 12, 2012
Tuesday, December 11, 2012
What they really mean...
Recently, the economist Mr. Paul Krugman, in an editorial published by the New York Times, points out a myth that is trumpeted as fact whenever the right discover a public service that they think should be privatized. In this case the service is health care. The associated myth is that a privatized health care system would result in reduced cost to the tax payer. But there is a problem: There is not one health care system anywhere in the world that went from public to private and cost the taxpayer less. Not one. In a related application of the same "get government out of business" (an insanity - as if the health of the nation's citizenry is a business), in food production in the USA and Canada, the real, direct cost to the taxpayer (especially the farmer/rancher) and the ancillary environmental cost have skyrocketed since Secretary Butz started to dismantle the New Deal.
That's just "wooden-headed" says one critic of Krugman's, claiming that a corporation can be "replaced" if it's not performing in the free marketplace. This, despite the fact that there is no "market" (i.e., no competition) to work its "magic".
Not to mention that if this mythical "free marketplace" with its "level playing field" were to ever exist (and it never has), the socioeconomic landscape would look very different indeed.
History has shown us that when it comes to essential public services, costs have spiraled when they have been turned over to the private sector. So this is the message: When the conservatives/republicans/right -- aw hell, politicians of any stripe -- say "free market/enterprise", reach for your wallet and don't let go. Those are code phrases that tell you that they are setting up for a run on your wallet. Everybody's wallet. Because while they say that it will cost less, it will really cost you more. It always has. Or at least it has since the Phoenicians were selling grain to Rome.
Not to mention that if this mythical "free marketplace" with its "level playing field" were to ever exist (and it never has), the socioeconomic landscape would look very different indeed.
History has shown us that when it comes to essential public services, costs have spiraled when they have been turned over to the private sector. So this is the message: When the conservatives/republicans/right -- aw hell, politicians of any stripe -- say "free market/enterprise", reach for your wallet and don't let go. Those are code phrases that tell you that they are setting up for a run on your wallet. Everybody's wallet. Because while they say that it will cost less, it will really cost you more. It always has. Or at least it has since the Phoenicians were selling grain to Rome.
The last part of the myth is the cruelest. This is the part where the 99 are duped into believing that they have just as good a chance as the 1 percent of ascending the ladder and joining the ranks of the obscenely rich. "Only in America!" Rags-to-riches tales are trotted out on a ritual basis to "prove" that anyone can become a "1%-er." With this bait, it is only too easy to cast aside scruples, values, and ethics, never mind independent thinking. Once that happens the masses support the myth and more lambs go to the slaughter.
It doesn't take a genius to ask the question: if everybody has the same shot, how come all the money is in even fewer hands these days?
Wednesday, November 28, 2012
The Tools. Amazing, Fantabulous, and otherwise...
![]() |
| L-R: Dan Levy, Roland Kirouac, Lucio Agostini, Shane Adams, Dave Taylor, Myles Dutton |
I haven't posted anything since the 5th of March. Trying to outddo Jay's delay-in-posting... well, it ain't working, bro. And besides, I've been busy. Not that there is a lot to write about - Einstein's comments about "everyday" and "miraculous" apply here. So, everything is revealed as it should be: looking at the pictures is the key.
One of my first 'commissioned' photos. The negative is in parts unknown and this is an un-retouched scan of an 8x10.
And thirty-some years later...we re-shot it. Just for fun.
![]() |
| The Tools in 2011 |
We should all be over the hill by now, but we're just hitting our prime. At least in the beauty department, that is. And, plenty of metaphor here. I'll leave it to you...
Monday, March 5, 2012
The End of Everything - collaboration with Gus Horn
The End of Everything is a small collection of photographs and the first in a projected series of collaborations with conceptual artist Gus Horn. The series was first presented as part of an installation accompanying Richard Heinberg's lecture in 100 Mile House, British Columbia, where he elaborated on some of the concepts in his latest book, "The End of Growth". The series explores themes such as commodification, fossil fuels, and agronomy.
You can click here to go directly to the gallery on my website or click here to go to the www.ShaneTylerAdams.com homepage.
Sunday, November 13, 2011
Solo Exhibition in Toronto
My one-man show is up and running in Toronto. The Annex Live/Dooney's Cafe is graciously giving space to 38 prints - a sampling of some of the work that I've done over the last three years. Here is one of the posters advertising the show. I'm honoured to be exhibiting there. Dooney's has a long tradition of patronage of the arts and the proprietor, Graziano Marchese, has re-activated the name of the original cafe where he started it all. The show will run into the spring and I look forward to seeing you there.
The Annex Live/Dooney's Cafe - 296 Brunswick Avenue, Toronto
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)

















































